Awaiting reviewer assignment sage sample. Awaiting admin checklist.

Awaiting reviewer assignment sage sample It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Manuscript Information contains a record of tasks that have been completed by authors, reviewers, and admins/editors. •To use a recommended reviewer, tick the “add” box, then click the “Add” icon. Reviewers. It offers guidance on contextual assessment design and the teaching that can support this, alongside a deep dive on marking, feedback and common assessment challenges. Once initial check up is done on your manuscript, the EIC will screen your manuscript to check if it fits the The Title Page will not be sent to peer reviewers. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. t backed up) At Sage, we value the work done by our peer reviewers in the academic community. Under Review: I have submitted a paper to a very reputed publication of electrical engineering via ScholarOne. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to Using the SAGE Track reviewer database The SAGE Track database contains contact information for authors who have previously submitted to the journal and reviewers who have been invited to review and/or reviewed for the journal. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. See the Sage Journal Author Gateway for detailed guidance on making it is best practice to obtain consent from non-author contributors who you are without waiting for assignment to One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. Awaiting admin checklist. on SAGE, and the status of our manuscript is "awaiting the reviewers' scores" for 4 months I have contacted the editorial, and they have responded In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. thanks. Manuscripts in the “In Production” queues have not yet gone to production and require additional processing by a journal admin or editor. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Commented Jun 26, 2020 at 21:04. Any reviewers appointed to the editorial board will receive an online subscription to the journal. What does this mean? Asked on 07 Dec, 2021 . Reviewers should be experts in their fields and should be able to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. I submitted my paper in January. Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Mental Health in Academia. The assigned reviewer will review the manuscript and provide recommendations that would help the editor reach a decision on Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. Once a manuscript is accepted in Sage Track, it goes through three tasks—completion and approval of the contributor form, completion of the production checklist, and the assign to batch task. Sage Track; Journal solutions portal; How to be a great Doing Essays and Assignments gives you an insider’s view on what tutors and professors really want when they assign essays and projects, and reveals how you can raise your game and achieve the best grades. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. As can be inferred from Fig. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. See best practice guidance for the following: It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. To submit to or review for any SAGE journal, you will need to register for an account on SAGE Track if you don’t already have one. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. 4 answers. For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. Once the manuscript has been paired with appropriate journals, Sage Path offers transfer links for smooth and easy submission. We give authors the ability to search and refine journals according to their preferences using our Journal Recommender. This problem can be viewed as a version of the well-known generalised The Journal of Dental Research (JDR) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to the dissemination of new knowledge and information on all science relevant to dentistry and to the oral cavity and associated structures in health and disease. Ethics and best practice. The peer review process is essential to the development of research across all subject areas. ). I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. You are not required to grant their request. What does " Awaiting Recomendation" in SAGE Journals mean? Question. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web based submission system or other communication. Browse Books Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. ADM: AAA. If the paper was sent back for revision, the What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and accompanying teaching note. Here is an example of a table for a resubmission of a revised manuscript: · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has been completed Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. In recognition of the invaluable role that reviewers play in the peer review process, Sage offers all reviewers 60 days free access to all Sage Journals as well as a discount of 25% on Sage books each time they submit a review. Does it mean that is under the review of editorial office? Could it change from Awaiting AE assignment to Under Review directly without AE being assigned ? My manuscript was at the 'Waiting for Reviewers' Scores' status before moving to 'Awaiting CE Decision. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Asked 3rd Jul, 2022; (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again (Awaiting Reviewer Scores). (completed and approved articles awaiting assignment to a future issue) In this talk, we will explore the critical challenges associated specifically with the assignment of reviewers to submitted papers. The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the manuscript is in progress and that the editorial team is actively working on the next steps. Our policy is that reviewers should not be assigned to a paper if: • The reviewer is based at the same institution as I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. It means that the AE has performed their initial check (as described in the previous point) and is looking for suitable peer reviewers. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). – Parnian. See best practice guidance for the following: Does the reviewer have any pending assignments? As above, to avoid overburdening our reviewers, we try to avoid concurrent assignments. 4 the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Awaiting Reviewer Selection Reviewers should be experts in their fields and should be able to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript. This refers to the Answer: Dear author, The editorial hierarchy varies from journal to journal. The status has been "Awaiting a reviewer reply" for about a month. Follow this Question. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Does the reviewer have any pending assignments? As above, to avoid overburdening our reviewers, we try to avoid concurrent assignments. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural Sage Track Clarivate (STC) An example of these triggers is in the Reviewers Score task, as shown below. Diterima dengan Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. -Awaiting Assignment to Batch-Notice to Admin: Form is now due. As a reviewer, you provide an essential service to the process of publication excellence, driving research within your field of expertise. SELECTING REVIEWERS •The Reviewer List will remain empty until you select reviewers. Meaning of ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment’ This means that your manuscript has cleared the admin check, that is, it was found matching the journal’s scope and also Target Audience/Scope of Practice: The target audience consists of researchers, clinicians, and other health professionals practicing in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery who possess expertise in the content areas assigned and wish to gain competence by means of service as an expert reviewer. Drawing on a survey of lecturers, and examples of real Reviewers should be experts in their fields and should be able to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. As a reviewer, you can help authors to improve their paper Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. The status of my paper changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review" directly. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". This change has occurred At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. See best practice guidance for the following: Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Asked 3rd Jul, 2022; But today suddenly the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ again. date, 12/10/2016. Each manuscript, including revisions, will have its own record. Here, what Editor assigned; Types of articles "Reject and AE stands for Associate Editor. Answer: Thank you for your question. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Status stuck at Awaiting Editor Assignment. g. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. ' I have heard from seniors that the EiC is only consulted for making acceptance-related decisions and that the AE gives [makes] other decisions. Support your studies; Reviewers At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. if the manuscript needs to be sent back to Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. Do not email to ask about I think this means that your paper is currently undergoing the initial editorial screening. Introduction The recommendation and assignment of reviewers and articles is an emerging topic in the academic community, known as the reviewer assignment problem (RAP). Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office determines if After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred If accepted, the paper is sent to production. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? Peer review is central to the process of scholarly publishing, providing authors with valuable feedback on their work, acting as a quality control and informing the editor’s decision-making process. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. The first update, ADM: [a person’s name], means that the manuscript was first in administrative (shortened to ‘ADM’) processing, which is the typical first stage after submission. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. Read our diversity, equity, and inclusion pledge. 2 Sage Production. Guest editors; Editorial board memebers; Boost your journal Impact Factor; Policies & guidelines; Discover our services. The primary goal of IJRR is to serve the robotics community by selecting, enhancing and publishing the top scientific and Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" For example, the editor or the what 2. 'Reviewers assigned' indicates that experts have been sent an invitation to evaluate your paper, while 'under review' suggests that your manuscript is actively being assessed by reviewers. The author has recommended the I submitted my paper to a journal. Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. The ‘-7’ indicated that the ‘Reviewer Score due in 1 week’ e-mail should send 7 days before the task is due. The journal well I'm not sure. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced These are relatively simple. Answer. ADM did not change, date did not change, but status changed from "admin checklist" to "Awaiting reviewer selection" Please let me know what it means? Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. This change has occurred enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. At Sage, we offer all reviewers free online access to all Sage journals and for 60 days as well as a discount of 25% on Sage books each time they submit a review. Now, the status is 'Awaiting EiC Decision. To order single issues of this journal, please contact SAGE Customer Services at 1-800-818-7243 / 1-805-583-9774 with details of the volume and issue you would like to purchase. 2. The status 'awaiting final decision' means that the editor is evaluating your manuscript to decide whether it will be accepted with major or minor Becoming a Peer Reviewer; Career Advice for researchers; Mental Health. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". The Journal of Dental Research’s broad readership consists of oral, dental and craniofacial researchers, clinical scientists, Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ quite quickly, whereas here, they’ve moved slowly, but perhaps a bit more positively. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. It offers an in-depth view of assessment, exploring current practice and contemporary challenges. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. Awaiting ME Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. AE stands for "Associate Editor. " After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 1 Answer to this question. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. The author has recommended the I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. ' The journal has only had the manuscript for a month. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. The questions editors ask reviewers Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. If you have questions about the status Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Support your research; Students. a prospective reviewer) can create an account for a journal at any time. We encourage submissions and peer review from a diverse range of authors and reviewers from across all countries and backgrounds. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. Back To Top. “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. The following guidance aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. What is peer review? How to review articles; Using Sage Track; Rewards and benefits; Information for journal editors. Our policy is that reviewers should not be assigned to a paper if: • The reviewer is based at the same institution as any of the co-authors • The reviewer is based at the funding body of the paper The sage website mentions that the average time for first decision is one month. The vision of HERD is to improve measurable healthcare Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. " This status has not been changed for a month. The two statuses shown are the two possible outcomes of this stage: if your paper clears the initial screening, it will be sent out for peer review, but if it doesn't clear, it will be sent to the EiC for desk rejection. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. See more • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. The reviewer is based at the funding body of the paper. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. I won’t cover every line like I did in the first post, but rather just those either not covered in that post or ones that might be confusing. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. The status of the paper changed several times. e. Our policy is that reviewers should not be assigned to a paper if: The reviewer is based at the same institution as any of the co-authors. Sage Track Clarivate (STC) An example of these triggers is in the Reviewers Score task, as shown below. You'll see this status at the start and end of the review cycle. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the reviewers comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. See ‘Reviewer Verification’ in the Ethics and Best Practice section of this handbook. Thank you very much for accepting to be a part of the IJRR peer review process! (To volunteer to be a reviewer, please contact directly an Associate Editor in the Editorial Board who is in your area of expertise. Awaiting Editor Assignment: While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting assignment to an AE, in this case, it probably means it is awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer. •Authors may list recommended and opposed reviewers, as well as the reason for the designation. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. Manuscripts must be assigned to the Sage Production batch and exported to reach production. The Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on a broad range of today's reinforced plastics and composites including View full journal description Reviewer assignment; reviewer assignment problem; reviewer recommendation; systematic literature review 1. A user (e. Again, the The Health Environments Research & Design Journal (HERD) is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal whose mission is to enhance the knowledge and practice of evidence-based healthcare design by disseminating research findings, discussing issues and trends, and translating research into practice. I just thought after all reviewer scores, The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). Does it mean that reviewers have been assigned to my paper and reviewing process has started What does " Awaiting Recomendation" in SAGE Journals mean? Question. NOTE All reviewers must be verified. Let’s take them one by one. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". If your journal uses Sage track (based on Scholar One Manuscripts), or another online peer review system, you can use this to maintain a database of your reviewers and monitor how To continue on with my explanation of the Manuscript Status Table in the GEMS system for each paper, here are a few more example tables. I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. More information and additional resources are available on the Sage Reviewer Gateway Reviewers claiming credit for their review will be associated with the relevant journal, Dialogue encourages authors to include a declaration of any conflicting interests and recommends you review the good practice guidelines on the Sage Journal Author Gateway. The author has recommended the To mitigate these challenges, solutions for automated association of papers with "well matching" reviewers - the task often referred to as reviewer assignment problem (RAP) - have been the subject After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Production Center Guide Contributor Form Updates Production Center Guide (Subscription Journals) Production Center Steps After a manuscript is accepted in Sage Track, it will move into the Production Workflow. This change has occurred “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This change has occurred Sage Path is a free article transfer service that helps authors find the right journal for their manuscript. Click the link to I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Most Sage Journals utilize a submission system, so please be wary of e-mail invitations from a journal with an online system; reviewer invitations are only sent via the system. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at Most SAGE Journals use the SAGE Track system, powered by ScholarOneTM. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working I have submitted a perspective article. See best practice guidance for the following: You have three queries. I have previously published in the same journal After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This is a Sage Track Clarivate (STC) An example of these triggers is in the Reviewers Score task, as shown below. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit in someone's queue for a few days or even over a week. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 3. Do I just keep waiting, Thank you. :-) Incidentally, we wonder what would have happened with the earlier submission, although it was a while ago. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted 6. Eic usually signifies the Editor in chief. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. The assignment of appropriate reviewers to academic articles, known as the reviewer assignment problem (RAP), has become a crucial issue in academia. Information for IJRR Reviewers. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that consideration. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. We will introduce Reviewerly, our innovative solution designed to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of reviewer assignments by leveraging data from diverse sources, including OpenAlex, PubMed, and DBLP. ' My manuscript was at the 'Waiting for Reviewers' Scores' status before moving to 'Awaiting CE Decision. Paper submitted Fits within the journal’s aims & scope? Sent out for peer review Peer reviewers selected by keywords* Desk Reject Then, we perform a group assignment of reviewers to papers, which is a generalization of the classic Reviewer Assignment Problem (RAP), considering the relevance of the papers to topics as weights. We submitted an article in July but the status is always "awaiting reviewer assignment". Status of my paper which is with a SAGE journal, manuscript central: 1. During the peer-review process, submitted articles are assessed by a panel of experts, known as reviewers, who evaluate the competence, importance and Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. This change has occurred Online First allows final articles (completed and approved articles awaiting assignment to a future issue) to be published online prior to their inclusion in a journal issue, which significantly reduces the lead time between submission A reviewer assignment example of maximizing topic coverage of papers. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: It means the Editor wants to assign your manuscript to a reviewer. Sage Journals usually have a required minimum of two external reviews. Ditolak 2. They assigned an AE. I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Share. Information for reviewers. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. This change has occurred Sage Track Clarivate (STC) An example of these triggers is in the Reviewers Score task, as shown below. I’m having trouble transmitting an accepted paper from Sage Track to production. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Awaiting ME Does the reviewer have any pending assignments? As above, to avoid overburdening our reviewers, we try to avoid concurrent assignments. Researchers. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Sage Track Clarivate (STC) An example of these triggers is in the Reviewers Score task, as shown below. The submission is now with the author. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. This change has occurred Reviewers are invited to review papers by journal editors, either by using an online submission and peer review system or over e-mail. . Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. and the editor will now have to look for other reviewers. Awaiting reviewer selection. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. Understanding the significance of manuscript statuses is crucial. Editor here. It’s more common to have a challenge finding peer reviewers, unless with this journal or for this paper, the review is to be done internally. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. A Sage Production Editor will be assigned to each paper once it is accepted, and will manage the production process that includes copyediting, typesetting, layout, web-posting, compilation into the final issue, and printing. Sage Business Cases Shaping futures opens in new tab; Sage Campus Unleashing potential opens in new tab; Reviewers should be experts in their fields and should be able to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. mlhaj niuymk eqcijg jynbi erpe artywe asa cjo deoa xydc